She has no idea what the second amendment actually means. She needs to reread the federalist papers to understand why the 2nd amendment is there. This concerns me actually, when a sitting judge can decide what is constitutional by her "feelings", this doesn't bode well for anybody except the statist. This also shows a problem, if somebody leaves the supreme court in the next 2 years, Obama can put another liberal in there and tilt the balance of court to coincide with the rubber stamp he has in the senate.
Hey Doug;
ReplyDeleteShe has no idea what the second amendment actually means. She needs to reread the federalist papers to understand why the 2nd amendment is there. This concerns me actually, when a sitting judge can decide what is constitutional by her "feelings", this doesn't bode well for anybody except the statist. This also shows a problem, if somebody leaves the supreme court in the next 2 years, Obama can put another liberal in there and tilt the balance of court to coincide with the rubber stamp he has in the senate.