Assessing Islam's chosen course

Prior to George Bush, I dare ya to find anyone calling Islam a "religion of peace."

Islam is a hard-line religion that insists on submission.

A guy named Matt Bracken writes:

A meaningful or permanent reformation of Islam is impossible, because a new generation of fanatics, wielding the unexpurgated Koran and Hadith as their weapons, will always declare the reformists to be apostates and murder them. In Islam, the fanatics who are holding the unalterable Koran in one hand and a sword in the other always stand ready to seize complete power and exterminate their enemies.  

This latent danger breeds fear and causes nearly all non-Muslims to be carefully circumspect in their dealings with Muslims, lest they lose their heads at a later date. This intentionally fostered fear of Islam is used as a cudgel against those who would otherwise resist its domination. The immutable Koran is the constant fountainhead of bloody Islamic conquest. Radical Islam is the pure Islam, the Koranic Islam, the real Islam.  

Anyone who does not understand this bitter reality is dangerously ignorant of the past 1,400 years of human history. 

Bracken's assessment aligns with Islam's history.

Bracken also speculates radical Islam may be on the verge of initiating a Tet style offensive in Europe as soon as in 2016.

But don't get hung up on the time frame. If a Tet style offensive is in the makng, those prepping for a conquest play may wait until the flow of reinforcements out of the Middle East slows.

Last I heard, Europe expects to receive another three million Muslim migrants next year alone.